Entries Tagged as 'defense attorneys'
August 31st, 2009 · 1 Comment
HOUSTON — R. Allen Stanford’s relationship with the chief regulator of his Antigua bank was closer than most.
James M. Davis, Mr. Stanford’s chief financial officer, leaving court on Thursday with his wife, Lori, and lawyer, David Finn.
At a meeting in 2003, they became blood brothers, cutting their wrists and mixing their blood in a “brotherhood ceremony� that Mr. Stanford’s chief financial officer said promoted an elaborate scheme to hide a multibillion-dollar fraud from American and other regulators.
[Read more →]
Tags: David Finn · Stanford · Texas · criminal law · federal law
By Brenda Sapino Jeffreys
Texas Lawyer
August 31, 2009
After pleading guilty on Aug. 27 to three criminal charges that could put him in prison for 30 years, James M. Davis, the former chief financial officer for Stanford Financial Group and Stanford International Bank Ltd., expressed remorse for his actions that contributed to the downfall of the bank [...]
[Read more →]
Tags: David Finn · Stanford · Texas · criminal law · defense attorneys · federal law
http://www.dallasobserver.com/2009-04-09/news/sec-says-texas-financier-sir-allen-stanford-swindled-investors-out-of-billions/
[Read more →]
Tags: David Finn · Stanford · Texas · criminal law · federal law
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
ROBERT SORICH, TIMOTHY McCARTHY, AND PATRICK SLATTERY
v.
UNITED STATES
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 08–410. Decided February 23, 2009
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
McNally v. United States, 483 U. S. 350 (1987), this Court held that [...]
[Read more →]
Tags: Texas · Texas FLDS · criminal law · government
For the second time in less than a week, the Supreme Court has summarily reversed a federal appeals court for failing to strictly follow post-Booker sentencing law.Â
In Nelson v. United States, __ S.Ct. __, 2009 WL 160585 (Jan. 26, 2009), the Court took the Fourth Circuit to task for affirming a within-guidelines sentence despite the [...]
[Read more →]
Tags: Dallas Courts · criminal law · federal law · government · supreme court opinions
COALITION TO PRESERVE THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
American Chemistry Council
American Civil Liberties Union
Association of Corporate Counsel
Business Civil Liberties, Inc.
Business Roundtable
The Financial Services Roundtable
Frontiers of Freedom
Lawyers for Civil Justice
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
National Association of Manufacturers
Retail Industry Leaders Association
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
COMPREHENSIVE REFORM STILL CRITICALLY NEEDED TO PROTECT
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND EMPLOYEE LEGAL RIGHTS
In response to growing concerns [...]
[Read more →]
Tags: David Finn · criminal law · federal law
WASHINGTON, DC — The Coalition to Preserve the Attorney-Client Privilege issued the following statement on the Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation proceedings scheduled for January 15, 2009 on the nomination of Eric H. Holder Jr., to be Attorney General of the United States:
[Read more →]
Tags: David Finn · Department of Justice · Texas · criminal law · federal law
2007/2008 Expunction Law Update
Case Law and Statutory Changes
- Just the Highlights –
On June 1, 2007, the Texas Supreme Court issued an opinion upholding the line of cases, which required the expiration of the statute of limitations as a condition precedent to the expunction of arrest records in all cases where the arrested person was NOT charged by indictment with the commission of a felony offense.
[Read more →]
Tags: Dallas · Dallas court · David Finn · defense attorneys
CRIMINAL PRACTICE IN TEXAS
STATE AND U.S. DISTRICT COURTS – A COMPARISON
by: George R. Milner, III
Milner & Finn
Dallas, Texas
www.milnerfinn.com
I. INTRODUCTION
Most attorneys will begin their careers practicing in either state or federal court, but rarely both.
[Read more →]
Tags: Uncategorized · criminal law
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHER DISTRICT OF IOWA
DAVENPORT DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CRIMINAL ACTION NO.
)
Plaintiff, ) 3:03-CR-80
)
v. )
)
JOHN ADAMS THROPAY, )
)
Defendant. )
)
SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION TO VACATE , SET ASIDE OR CORRECT SENTENCE UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2255BY A PERSON IN FEDERAL CUSTODY
F. Clinton Broden
Tx. Bar 24001495
Broden & Mickelsen
2707 Hibernia St.
Dallas, Texas 75204
214-720-9552
214-720-9594 (facsimile)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF [...]
[Read more →]
Tags: Uncategorized · defense attorneys